What you or I think is besides the point with regard to bias on the BBC.

I hate their output, it's pretty poor. I can honestly say I rarely watch any of their recent shows. Sure, I watch a lot of re-runs of old BBC shows, it has televised some truly great stuff, but these days there is nothing at all that I would watch. And also, as I mentioned, there seems to be an awful lot of paedophilia associated with the BBC. I'm not equipped with enough of the facts, but it does seem awfully suspicious that so many sexual predators were able to get away with it for so long...

Did you not read or did you just watch the clips?

The use of the word 'mock' in the headline....completely inappropriate. The BBC choice of headline and commentary in the article is obviously what I'm referring to.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

In defence of the BBC, I think back in the 70s, they really were the biggest employer in terms of entertainment and broadcasting in the UK - ITV was largely regionalised, and consisted of a lot of fairly small scale operations.

I think it was a Pre-late 80s thing, where peoples sexual politics were more 'if I can justify this in a court of law, then its moral and ethically right'.

ITV however does seem to have cornered the market in Wife Beating Alcoholics. So maybe the reason they're under represented in child fiddling offences is that they were all under restraining orders?

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

[Link]

This article barely touches on Clinton. All it says is she represents continuity, as if the US didn't make heaps of errors under her authority as Secretary of State.

I ain't got nuthin' funny to say. Sorry.

There is a cross over of Left and liberal. Those on the Left of politics tend to be more liberal. Call it what you like the prejudice is everywhere in broadcasting.