You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > 'Growing racial segregation'
April 26 2024 2.33am

'Growing racial segregation'

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 14 of 15 < 10 11 12 13 14 15 >

 

View Jimenez's Profile Jimenez Flag SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 21 Nov 16 9.12pm Send a Private Message to Jimenez Add Jimenez as a friend

Originally posted by Cucking Funt

Where will the proles get their cheap (in every sense of the word) clobber if shops like Primark and Sports Direct have to source their merchandise from somewhere other than a sweatshop?

I dread to think Old boy!!

 


Pro USA & Israel

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Pista Flag Bristol 22 Nov 16 9.20am

Originally posted by Hoof Hearted

Ignore business, economics etc.

Geographically the UK cannot sustain a huge rise in population from where it is now.

Severely restricting future immigration will give us a chance to at least get close to providing sufficient homes for those already here and their offspring.

Even so, it is going to be very crowded, especially in London and the South East.

If you ignore economics then where do you hope to find the money to build all those houses?

 


old time bbs refugee

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Pista Flag Bristol 22 Nov 16 9.30am

Originally posted by Dan1994

I'm more worried about the amount of people hitting retirement age, and that me and my mates won't be able to support a family and them. Even sadder that the NHS has had their resources cut, since a large amount of our population will rely on it heavily very soon.

People like Hoof already do rely on the NHS and yes more and more of us will.

Yet he wants to drastically reduce the number of immigrants when it has been proved that immigrants are younger and work meaning that they help fund the NHS and will do for a long time to come.

Seems a bit contradictory to me.

Beyond Palace the other thing we all have in common is that we've all been let down by our politicians. We should all blame them and not immigrants and each other.

 


old time bbs refugee

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 22 Nov 16 9.44am

Originally posted by Cucking Funt

Where will the proles get their cheap (in every sense of the word) clobber if shops like Primark and Sports Direct have to source their merchandise from somewhere other than a sweatshop?

From the British sweatshops that they're going to be forced to work in? Good British Sweatshops and workhouses full of exploited British workers....

Viva la Nationalism.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 22 Nov 16 9.47am

Originally posted by Pista

People like Hoof already do rely on the NHS and yes more and more of us will.

Yet he wants to drastically reduce the number of immigrants when it has been proved that immigrants are younger and work meaning that they help fund the NHS and will do for a long time to come.

Seems a bit contradictory to me.

Beyond Palace the other thing we all have in common is that we've all been let down by our politicians. We should all blame them and not immigrants and each other.

I think people on the right tend to think of immigration as permanent, rather than consider the benefits of temporary migration. of course the consequence of a large disposable work force is low wages, which means you raise less tax.

The issue of the NHS for the right, its easier to blame migrants, rather than the source which is funding and support - and taxation which should have been levied against that profit generated through the exploitation of EU migrant workers.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Hoof Hearted 22 Nov 16 11.26am

Originally posted by Pista

If you ignore economics then where do you hope to find the money to build all those houses?

There's no room to build the houses and necessary infrastructure anyway.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Hoof Hearted 22 Nov 16 11.34am

Originally posted by Pista

People like Hoof already do rely on the NHS and yes more and more of us will.

Yet he wants to drastically reduce the number of immigrants when it has been proved that immigrants are younger and work meaning that they help fund the NHS and will do for a long time to come.

Seems a bit contradictory to me.

Beyond Palace the other thing we all have in common is that we've all been let down by our politicians. We should all blame them and not immigrants and each other.

I do not rely on the NHS.... I have BUPA cover thank you very much.... and before you ask... no I don't get sickness or unemployment benefit either. I was an IFA I retired at age 50 and I am financially secure due to prudent financial planning.

Please don't make assumptions about my personal circumstances to strengthen your arguments and try to make me look silly.

As for immigrants funding the NHS when they're younger... what about when they get older?

All you are advocating is a pyramid scheme!

I do blame politicians... in particular Tony Blair who adopted an open door policy for immigration and worsened a situation that was already fcuked.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Hoof Hearted 22 Nov 16 11.40am

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

I think people on the right tend to think of immigration as permanent, rather than consider the benefits of temporary migration. of course the consequence of a large disposable work force is low wages, which means you raise less tax.

The issue of the NHS for the right, its easier to blame migrants, rather than the source which is funding and support - and taxation which should have been levied against that profit generated through the exploitation of EU migrant workers.

I think people on the left are too quick to spend other peoples money on stuff that we can't afford.

And the reason is that most of you have never worked for a company that has to generate profit to survive so you think money grows on trees.

Teachers, Civil Servants and the like.... all cosy in your 9-5 jobs with pension benefits paid for by the private sector workers taxes.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 22 Nov 16 12.00pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

I think people on the right tend to think of immigration as permanent, rather than consider the benefits of temporary migration. of course the consequence of a large disposable work force is low wages, which means you raise less tax.

The issue of the NHS for the right, its easier to blame migrants, rather than the source which is funding and support - and taxation which should have been levied against that profit generated through the exploitation of EU migrant workers.

No it is not easier. It is just a fact that more immigrants means more people for the NHS to deal with. Simple logic.The make up of NHS staff is due to under investment in British workers.
This should not be a left/right issue but it has become about certain people ignoring simple realities because it doesn't fit with their politics.

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (22 Nov 2016 12.01pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 22 Nov 16 12.08pm

Originally posted by Hoof Hearted

I think people on the left are too quick to spend other peoples money on stuff that we can't afford.

And the reason is that most of you have never worked for a company that has to generate profit to survive so you think money grows on trees.

Teachers, Civil Servants and the like.... all cosy in your 9-5 jobs with pension benefits paid for by the private sector workers taxes.

The civil service, including the broader scope, represents society and its functionality on a daily basis. Much of which works to protect companies capacity to generate a profit. Its not always a cushy number either, especially outside of London, where most of the work will be council and court services

Its not particularly well paid either, and the work can vary from tedious through to 'lives in the balance and heartbreaking'. I processed and administered domestic violence injunctions for 4.50 an hour. I also worked in crown and magistrates (which means I had to prep cases, which varied from stupid thefts through to child rape rings and sex offences.


Whilst I have worked in the Civil service - I'm self employed and generally have worked in the private sector and my experience is that... its very much subsidised by government contracts, rather lucrative ones at that.

Private sector is cushy if you ask me. 16 years, and I've not dealt with child abuse, rape, murder, kidnapping, protection orders, domestic violence victims etc..

Plus I don't get a civil service pension, despite having done three years.


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 22 Nov 16 12.12pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

No it is not easier. It is just a fact that more immigrants means more people for the NHS to deal with. Simple logic.The make up of NHS staff is due to under investment in British workers.
This should not be a left/right issue but it has become about certain people ignoring simple realities because it doesn't fit with their politics.

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (22 Nov 2016 12.01pm)

But why are they coming here, and who benefits - and what do they pay additionally to compensate those who are losing out.

I agree, we need to control migration. But its a symptom of the problem of how corporate entities operate in the UK, along with their responsibilities to the nation.

We could of course have raised minimum wage to a reasonable level during the boom. Don't get me wrong New Labour carry a massive burden of responsibility for f**king the working class to please corporate and middle class England.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 22 Nov 16 1.06pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

But why are they coming here, and who benefits - and what do they pay additionally to compensate those who are losing out.

I agree, we need to control migration. But its a symptom of the problem of how corporate entities operate in the UK, along with their responsibilities to the nation.

We could of course have raised minimum wage to a reasonable level during the boom. Don't get me wrong New Labour carry a massive burden of responsibility for f**king the working class to please corporate and middle class England.

Well you can't compensate people who have died because of NHS incompetence or shortages. My experiences of the NHS recently has been bordering on comedy. It is becoming almost pointless to go to a GP and if you have to go to hospital for anything serious, chances are they will lose your test results. It beggars belief. Now I'm sure people get saved every day on operating tables but judging by my family experience, they are the lucky ones.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 14 of 15 < 10 11 12 13 14 15 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > 'Growing racial segregation'