You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > The grand old duke of york, he had 10,000.........
April 26 2024 11.08pm

The grand old duke of york, he had 10,000.........

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 22 of 29 < 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >

 

View ASCPFC's Profile ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 15 Jan 22 11.12pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

I guess that since he's been stripped of his military duties, his beret is now in the second hand store.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Teddy Eagle's Profile Teddy Eagle Flag 15 Jan 22 11.35pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by ASCPFC

I guess that since he's been stripped of his military duties, his beret is now in the second hand store.

His helicopter could be in Poundland and not get a buyer.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
croydon proud Flag Any european country i fancy! 17 Jan 22 9.27pm

Apparently, the grand duke had a collection of 60 cuddly toys, and a picture of them all in a line, he kept them in a drawer and the picture on top. If the maids did not put them all on his bed, in same order as the picture, all hell broke out!Good for him-pesky maids taking the pizz out of his highness by not obeying orders!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Sir James Hird Flag Mount Martha 17 Jan 22 10.32pm

Isnt Andrew single? He could marry again into money, pay off the goldbrick and live happily ever after. There's a few wealthy sheilas about, how about some suggestions?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Forest Hillbilly's Profile Forest Hillbilly Flag in a hidey-hole 27 Jan 22 7.18am Send a Private Message to Forest Hillbilly Add Forest Hillbilly as a friend

His lawyers are really bad. They are now saying a few things, but digging a huge grave for their client's reputation :

1. The photo of Andrew, Giuffre and Maxwell is 'unproven' , so he can't comment.

He either knows he was there , or he wasn't. It's simple.

2. The friendship with Maxwell wasn't close.

There are many witness accounts of them staying in the same building at various worldwide locations (including Balmoral), across many years

3. Claims by Giuffre (formerly Roberts) are barred by the doctrine of consent.

In statutory rape claims, there can be no consent.

4. Andrew demands a trial by jury.

That is up the claimant to decide in civil trials in the US, apparently. And a jury trial has already been specified


This has got to end with a settlement £££, if only to spare the complete ineptitude of Andrews lawyers.


Edited by Forest Hillbilly (27 Jan 2022 8.04am)

 


"The facts have changed", Rishi Sunak

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag The garden of England 27 Jan 22 12.26pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by Forest Hillbilly

His lawyers are really bad. They are now saying a few things, but digging a huge grave for their client's reputation :

1. The photo of Andrew, Giuffre and Maxwell is 'unproven' , so he can't comment.

He either knows he was there , or he wasn't. It's simple.

2. The friendship with Maxwell wasn't close.

There are many witness accounts of them staying in the same building at various worldwide locations (including Balmoral), across many years

3. Claims by Giuffre (formerly Roberts) are barred by the doctrine of consent.

In statutory rape claims, there can be no consent.

4. Andrew demands a trial by jury.

That is up the claimant to decide in civil trials in the US, apparently. And a jury trial has already been specified


This has got to end with a settlement £££, if only to spare the complete ineptitude of Andrews lawyers.


Edited by Forest Hillbilly (27 Jan 2022 8.04am)

Which is what it's all been about!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
croydon proud Flag Any european country i fancy! 27 Jan 22 2.00pm

Originally posted by cryrst

Which is what it's all been about!

Only if he"s guilty of course! If he is innocent then he won"t pay a penny!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
BlueJay Flag UK 27 Jan 22 2.49pm

The BBC interview alone was must see. Imagine if this went to trial. Get the popcorn in. Can't see it happening though.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Matov's Profile Matov Flag 27 Jan 22 3.18pm Send a Private Message to Matov Add Matov as a friend

Originally posted by BlueJay

The BBC interview alone was must see. Imagine if this went to trial. Get the popcorn in. Can't see it happening though.


It's an interesting tactic. But what has he got to lose? His reputation is already in tatters, he has been effectively barred from being a Royal and so there ain't much else that can happen to him.

s*** or bust time. Plus it will force his accuser to justify her claims in a public court. All very well spinning stuff through a PR firm or statements from lawyers but being cross-examined by a hostile brief, that's a different ball game altogether.

And juries can be notoriously fickle about these matters. It might actually be Andrews saving grace.

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View steeleye20's Profile steeleye20 Flag Croydon 27 Jan 22 4.18pm Send a Private Message to steeleye20 Add steeleye20 as a friend

Originally posted by Matov


It's an interesting tactic. But what has he got to lose? His reputation is already in tatters, he has been effectively barred from being a Royal and so there ain't much else that can happen to him.

s*** or bust time. Plus it will force his accuser to justify her claims in a public court. All very well spinning stuff through a PR firm or statements from lawyers but being cross-examined by a hostile brief, that's a different ball game altogether.

And juries can be notoriously fickle about these matters. It might actually be Andrews saving grace.

You really think so M, it would be loaded against him.

He walks into trouble imo.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
BlueJay Flag UK 27 Jan 22 4.34pm

Originally posted by Matov


It's an interesting tactic. But what has he got to lose? His reputation is already in tatters, he has been effectively barred from being a Royal and so there ain't much else that can happen to him.

s*** or bust time. Plus it will force his accuser to justify her claims in a public court. All very well spinning stuff through a PR firm or statements from lawyers but being cross-examined by a hostile brief, that's a different ball game altogether.

And juries can be notoriously fickle about these matters. It might actually be Andrews saving grace.

It would be quite the spectacle but he's so out of touch with the average person that if he put himself on the stand it might not go well. With that said Americans have always had a fascination with the Royals and in terms of what many of Epsteins pals have no doubt got up to, its fair to see he's the 'fall guy' and that might bring a degree of sympathy from some jurors. Pretty sure he'll just offer a huge payout but if this somehow does go to court, it's 'must see' territory.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag The garden of England 27 Jan 22 8.07pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by croydon proud

Only if he"s guilty of course! If he is innocent then he won"t pay a penny!

And many on here will obviously return and apologise for their accusations being proven to be false! Baited breath......

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 22 of 29 < 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > The grand old duke of york, he had 10,000.........