Her story does seem to have changed several times already, and under oath for a couple too. First she said she had never met him, then in another testimony she admitted she had met him in London but said she never had sex with him, now he's supposed to have poked her all over the world.

As I was always taught, once you are found out for a liar, no-one will ever quite believe anything you say again.

A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers

Also complicated by the claim that the picture has been photoshopped even though the supposedly original picture seems to my uneducated eye to have been more tampered with.

I can't really think of any reason Andrew has to meet Epstein unless it's to bed girls.

There is the trafficked aspect and I don't think that should be waved aside. If it's overaged and consensual then my interest is far more on the cases that weren't.

Personally while I think Andrew is seedy I'm not of the view that he's going to bed some unwilling partner, but did he know her age?....don't know.

As has been said what's far more important is what the courts don't seem to be interested in......If all this gets pushed aside I despair.

Edited by Stirlingsays (06 Feb 2022 12.21pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Nothing to do with what I said.

Forgetting the Andrew story completely, describing someone who was groomed to that extent at a young age as a 'tart' is rank.

I think that’s right in that the picture is a photo of a photo and not the original.
This is the one claimed to be the original.

[Link]

In fairness this picture looks significantly more fake than the other one .

Regarding the original image even if it's real it's not as if it's crime of the century anyway. It's more what it has come to represent and the connection between the two individuals. Curious mind you, that no other images exist and so few people recall seeing them together? Though again, I don't deny the likelihood of some aspects of her story being true, just that it's also a convenient distraction from the wider story.

Rather curious that the Maxwell case somehow didn't appear to actually involve speaking about any of the clients.. Who these people are must be known, but there is unlikely to be any follow up. Shameful.