You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic
April 28 2024 7.38pm

Coronavirus (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 1097 of 1255 < 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 >

Topic Locked

View Phil’s Barber's Profile Phil’s Barber Flag Crowborough 24 Dec 21 3.56pm Send a Private Message to Phil’s Barber Add Phil’s Barber as a friend

Originally posted by BlueJay

I tend to follow the self reporting ZOE app as well as the mass swabbing by ONS. It wouldn't surprise be at the current pace if we're at about 2 million active infections. It's hard to see how it could feasibly go much higher than say 3 or 4 million before gradually petering out as it appears to be doing in South Africa. With it appearing to be more mild, if hospitals are fine in 2 or 3 weeks I'd say you're over the worst of Omicron. It's probably as much the risk of NHS staff all falling sick at the same time as admissions that's the concern! With each day that goes past without major issue, it's looking better I'd say. Fingers crossed.

Whilst I am encouraged by the early indications regarding the Omicron variant being less severe in terms of serious illness my optimism has been tempered somewhat today by reports I have been reading from SAGE and other groups around the potential hospitalisations.

In short they have been saying that thus far most of the Omicron cases have largely been in younger people who are less likely to get seriously ill and there is real concern about what happens when it hits the old and vulnerable populations. Also that despite it being up to 70% less severe in terms of illness it is hugely worse in terms of infection rates and transmissibility so the two could cancel themselves out and we could still see large numbers of hospitalisations in the coming weeks. All of this alongside a much depleted level of Doctors and Nurses who themselves have become infected and are off work.

Edited by Phil’s Barber (24 Dec 2021 4.03pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Eaglecoops's Profile Eaglecoops Flag CR3 24 Dec 21 4.30pm Send a Private Message to Eaglecoops Add Eaglecoops as a friend

Originally posted by Phil’s Barber

Whilst I am encouraged by the early indications regarding the Omicron variant being less severe in terms of serious illness my optimism has been tempered somewhat today by reports I have been reading from SAGE and other groups around the potential hospitalisations.

In short they have been saying that thus far most of the Omicron cases have largely been in younger people who are less likely to get seriously ill and there is real concern about what happens when it hits the old and vulnerable populations. Also that despite it being up to 70% less severe in terms of illness it is hugely worse in terms of infection rates and transmissibility so the two could cancel themselves out and we could still see huge numbers of hospitalisations in the coming weeks. All of this alongside a much depleted level of Doctors and Nurses who themselves have become infected.

Edited by Phil’s Barber (24 Dec 2021 3.57pm)

Do you actually believe what they are saying though at Sage, because omicron hasn’t just attacked younger people. Their sample was of younger people. I believe they are still trying to use project fear to keep people under control and make sure everyone gets vaccinated which I suppose is sort of understandable.

I would prefer it if however if they were just honest about numbers and the likely true impact of the omicron variant.

Everyone I know who has had covid recently, myself included (and none of them are in the younger age groups) have said the same thing, it is like a heavy cold with some weird symptoms thrown in.

If you are immune compromised or seriously ill already then yes omicron can probably cause serious illness, but then again so would flu or other issues for people in these circumstances.

The proof will be in the true figures for hospitalisations and deaths in the next three weeks but based on what myself and friends have experienced, this virus or certainly this variant is no longer the killer it was.

What I do agree with is that for a few weeks whilst this goes around like wildfire, there will be a shortage of staff in major services and they will not necessarily limited to hospitals. This should be a short term impact which I feel is acknowledged in part by the governments declaration to reduce the isolation period from 10 days to 7 to try and reduce the number of key staff out of work.

Not sure of the percentages but certainly a high percentage of those with covid now have it asymptomatically therefore I’m not sure how you can control it as there will be thousands who don’t even know they have it whilst they go about their everyday lives.

I personally think the virus is weakening and we are heading in the right direction. A few more weeks will show whether this is the case.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Phil’s Barber's Profile Phil’s Barber Flag Crowborough 24 Dec 21 5.25pm Send a Private Message to Phil’s Barber Add Phil’s Barber as a friend

I form my main opinion from personal experience, from what I see and know from family, friends and colleagues and further afield from things in general. Only a small part of that is from third hand reporting.

I am currently of the opinion that the Omicron variant causes less serious illness in most people in the non vulnerable category, even more so for those who have been vaccinated. I can see though how it may cause serious illness for those in the older age groups and those in the clinically vulnerable category. I think that is also what SAGE and other groups are saying, so with the increased transmissibility of the Omicron variant it could easily be the cause of a large number of hospitalisations if it gets in to those groups, which, because of its increased transmissibility, I believe it will.

I don’t believe they are ‘scaremongering’ as such as I believe this scenario more likely than not as we currently stand. I also believe the reports that it has thus far mainly only infected those in the younger age groups (aged 55 or less) and those not in the other vulnerable categories, as this accurately reflects my own experiences of the last few weeks and that of my sister who is currently working as a doctor on the wards in hospitals in Leicester and Nottingham.

I also think that a lot of infected people are a symptomatic and that also thousands of positive COVID results (Rapid Antigen Testing) are going unreported. Infection rates within the community are way more than is being currently reported so I think things will get a fair bit worse before they get any better.

If it hadn’t been the build up to Christmas and the fact that people are now well and truly brassed off with the restrictions and having to self isolate then I believe we would be getting a more realistic representation of what is actually happening in terms of confirmed cases.

Edited by Phil’s Barber (24 Dec 2021 5.46pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
BlueJay Flag UK 24 Dec 21 5.41pm

Originally posted by Phil’s Barber

Whilst I am encouraged by the early indications regarding the Omicron variant being less severe in terms of serious illness my optimism has been tempered somewhat today by reports I have been reading from SAGE and other groups around the potential hospitalisations.

In short they have been saying that thus far most of the Omicron cases have largely been in younger people who are less likely to get seriously ill and there is real concern about what happens when it hits the old and vulnerable populations. Also that despite it being up to 70% less severe in terms of illness it is hugely worse in terms of infection rates and transmissibility so the two could cancel themselves out and we could still see large numbers of hospitalisations in the coming weeks. All of this alongside a much depleted level of Doctors and Nurses who themselves have become infected and are off work.

Edited by Phil’s Barber (24 Dec 2021 4.03pm)

Lots of unknowns of course, but fewer as time goes by. Can only hope for the best over say the next two or three weeks and if things are still looking good or approaching that, this will hopefully then be another hurdle cleared.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
View Grumbles's Profile Grumbles 24 Dec 21 7.32pm Send a Private Message to Grumbles Add Grumbles as a friend

Originally posted by Forest Hillbilly

Numbers. You can organise them anyway you want, to suit your agenda.

1 + 1 = 3

It is not the numbers, purely the bias of the observer.

Couple of negative lateral flows and we should be free Sunday.

Edited by Grumbles (24 Dec 2021 7.33pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Tim Gypsy Hill '64's Profile Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Flag Stoke sub normal 24 Dec 21 11.43pm Send a Private Message to Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Add Tim Gypsy Hill '64 as a friend

Originally posted by Phil’s Barber

Oh dear this is SO unbelievably poor Tim, have you even read the ‘Fact Check’ article that you found?!

In it it clearly states…

In the three months up to the end of July, 73% of ICU admissions were unvaccinated, but that figure had dropped to 47% in October and 48% in the first half of November.

These figures, which are published by the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC), give the best available overview of Covid ICU admissions in England, Wales and Northern Ireland by vaccination status. But they come with some important caveats:

The ICNARC data is about the number of ICU admissions, not the number of patients in ICU at any given time. It is possible unvaccinated Covid patients in ICU tend to be more severely ill. If so, it is also possible they spend longer in ICU on average, and might therefore make up the majority “in ICU” at a given time—but we don't have clear evidence on this so we can't say for sure.
The proportions may have changed again since the ICNARC data was published. It only goes up to 15 November, which predates the spread of the Omicron variant
.


I clearly stated that the ‘90% of patients in ICU are unvaccinated’ claim, as reported this week by literally tens of mainstream media outlets, is for the current situation. Your alleged fact check data only goes up to 15 November which is almost 6 weeks ago AND is the number of ‘Admissions’ to ICU not the number of people actually in ICU. Your own Fact Check article even emphasises this point!


So in summary;
1) You haven’t even challenged the correct data.
2) The ICNARC data doesn’t include Scotland (which is most definitely part of the UK)
3) Your article refers to the wrong dates by some margin - so much so that ALL of the data ‘predates the spread of the Omicron’ variant.

Good Effort! You can pretty much find anything to prove anything on the internet…but when you do at least make it support your argument!


Edited by Phil’s Barber (24 Dec 2021 10.46am)

Well, I couldn't find any more recent fact checked data. But what it did show was that the trend of ICU admissions of unvaccinated patients was falling. In fact to less than 50%. But now, "almost 6 weeks" later, we are to believe that has been completely reversed, and is now 90% unvaccinated, with a new variant which is 50-70% less likely to result in hospital admission, let alone ICU admission, all on the anecdotal advice of a stressed out doctor in one hospital. All reported in the red tops and the ever-hated-one-eyed-conspiracy publishing Daily Mail, and echoed on MSM by celebrity doctors and other such mouthpieces.

The red stuff is guesswork.

Anyway, enough.

Happy Yuletide to you and your loved ones.

Peace.

Edited by Tim Gypsy Hill '64 (24 Dec 2021 11.58pm)

 


Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Phil’s Barber's Profile Phil’s Barber Flag Crowborough 25 Dec 21 12.14am Send a Private Message to Phil’s Barber Add Phil’s Barber as a friend

Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64

Well, I couldn't find any more recent fact checked data. But what it did show was that the trend of ICU admissions of unvaccinated patients was falling. In fact to less than 50%. But now, "almost 6 weeks" later, we are to believe that has been completely reversed, and is now 90% unvaccinated, with a new variant which is 50-70% less likely to result in hospital admission, let alone ICU admission, all on the anecdotal advice of a stressed out doctor in one hospital. All reported in the red tops and the ever-hated-one-eyed-conspiracy publishing Daily Mail, and echoed on MSM by celebrity doctors and other such mouthpieces.

The red stuff is guesswork.

Anyway, enough.

Happy Yuletide to you and your loved ones.

Peace.

Edited by Tim Gypsy Hill '64 (24 Dec 2021 11.58pm)

Peace indeed. A very Merry Christmas to you and yours too Tim.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
BlueJay Flag UK 25 Dec 21 12.42am

Merry Xmas all. Wishing you a happy and healthy 2022!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Online Flag The garden of England 25 Dec 21 12.47am Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by BlueJay

Merry Xmas all. Wishing you a happy and healthy 2022!

You too mate. Fingers crossed eh!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
BlueJay Flag UK 25 Dec 21 12.52am

Originally posted by cryrst

You too mate. Fingers crossed eh!

Definitely. We all deserve a more upbeat one after the last couple of years!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 26 Dec 21 11.23am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by ASCPFC

Merry Christmas. Enjoy yourselves!

Mission accomplished.

Tips hat.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 26 Dec 21 11.34am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

The problem with The Great Barrington declaration is the amount of people in households with people who would need to isolate. That would obviously depend on how far and how low you go with % risk but in 2020 the opposition to this had it at a very high % of the population isolating, with a lot of key workers in these households. The other big factor is how long you’d have them isolating. They would still be isolating now and into 2022.

But I think the idea that they can be sheltered from the virus once vaccinated isn't realistic. What's important is the viral load. The declaration understands that herd immunity is the only solution out there and that delay causes more not less pain.

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

The vulnerable isolating wouldn’t have meant this would have gone away. It might have meant Alpha and Delta blew through the population but there’s just another variant on the way, and another and another potentially. You could respond with needing to accept this and move on. To be able to do that in a responsible way the NHS would need more resources. This doesn’t happen instantly. They knew this when they dismantled the nightingale hospitals but erected them if a tsunami of death arose. They were only going to be manned by retired health workers and the army temporarily.

Whichever solution people propose there’s going to be losers, and that’s been happening with virtually every decision and restriction. I certainly agree that it’s an unfair burden of debt on the younger generations and their future, and oddly last year many remainers were arguing for a year long lockdown after pointing the finger at Leave voters for ruining the lives and futures of younger generations. But it seems we’re joining the whole of the western world on that one.

I don’t know where they’re going to go with this 4th vax in spring and one every 3 months even if they start with vulnerable, and then, as we’ve seen, move onto everyone else, and that could be it for me.

Edited by Rudi Hedman (23 Dec 2021 6.57pm)

I don't see much that we differ on to be honest.

I'm on the side of the fence that the costs incurred here have been unacceptable when you see society in its broadist terms.....this was a political arse covering not policy for the best long term health of the country. It's not the covid health service but that's what it was turned into. People have and are going to pay for that with their lives amide the suicides and economic suffering.

No, this approach wasn't for me.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post

Topic Locked

Page 1097 of 1255 < 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic