You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > What's coming into Western Europe ?.People or men?
June 14 2024 4.30am

What's coming into Western Europe ?.People or men?

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 9 of 20 < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 >

 

View DanH's Profile DanH Flag SW2 14 Aug 21 12.50pm Send a Private Message to DanH Add DanH as a friend

Originally posted by Spiderman

No but many do, if you were genuinely fleeing for your life, you would. Look at the refugee camps in Turkey. Personally I would not leave my wife and kids behind, would you? Because many of these migrants do, so not safe for the men but ok for women and children! Absolute b***ocks. I cannot state enough that the majority coming over the Channel are not Afghans. I will try to get a break down of those arriving at the weekend and let you know.
This may not suit your agenda but the vast majority are economic migrants. Can we continue to take an inordinate amount?

No but genuine Afghan refugees yes.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 14 Aug 21 1.22pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by DanH

No but genuine Afghan refugees yes.

No, they are surrounded by similarily cultured countries.

And the idea that we can perfectly tell who is 'genuine' from who isn't when no one turns up with details because of NGOs is more 'disney land' ideology.

This country now has multiple problems due to the 'global village' mentality of the 'progressive left' and the 'economic right'. Both supported the same disparate immigration just for different reasons.

Every drop of blood and suffering here that comes from higher crime rates, female mutilations, honour killings and terrorist attacks and all the rest of it is partly spilt blood they enabled.

They imported those problems here and then whenever these attacks happen they come out with their sadness comments.

When it's they who enabled it.....and if it were down to me I'd force them to live smack bang in the middle of the ghettos they create.

Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Aug 2021 1.24pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Spiderman's Profile Spiderman Flag Horsham 14 Aug 21 1.33pm Send a Private Message to Spiderman Add Spiderman as a friend

Originally posted by DanH

No but genuine Afghan refugees yes.

There are thousands of afghan refugees living in pakistan, they have no problems there and many in Islamabad are running thriving businesses. Far “easier” to trek over the Karakorams than trek through the whole of Europe

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Teddy Eagle's Profile Teddy Eagle Flag 14 Aug 21 1.37pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by DanH

Asylum seakers don’t have to stay in the first safe country.

At what stage do people stop being asylum seekers if they travel through several to get to the one of their choice?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View DanH's Profile DanH Flag SW2 14 Aug 21 2.12pm Send a Private Message to DanH Add DanH as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

At what stage do people stop being asylum seekers if they travel through several to get to the one of their choice?

Refugees have an international right to asylum. There is literally nothing that says it has to be in the first ‘safe’ country they manage to get to.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Beanyboysmd's Profile Beanyboysmd Flag 14 Aug 21 2.22pm Send a Private Message to Beanyboysmd Add Beanyboysmd as a friend

Originally posted by W12

Goes back to my point about democracy. Nobody voted for this, the majority didn’t want it but we got it anyway.

We have had tories running the country for 27 of the last 40 years and the entirety of the 2010s. You have been enjoying the fruits of tory policy.

In short you/we did vote for this. The majority did want it and got it

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Orange1290's Profile Orange1290 Flag 14 Aug 21 2.29pm Send a Private Message to Orange1290 Add Orange1290 as a friend

Originally posted by Beanyboysmd

We have had tories running the country for 27 of the last 40 years and the entirety of the 2010s. You have been enjoying the fruits of tory policy.

In short you/we did vote for this. The majority did want it and got it

Agree. This is the result of 'democracy', the same 'democracy' that that the UK & US keep trying to shove down the throats of other nations that don't want it.

 


Pro China, EU & Palestine

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 14 Aug 21 2.33pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by DanH

Refugees have an international right to asylum. There is literally nothing that says it has to be in the first ‘safe’ country they manage to get to.

If you are a genuine 'refugee' and fleeing for safety then it would be.

Choosing a location for preference is immigration.

Shows your 'genuine' for what it is.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Behind Enemy Lines's Profile Behind Enemy Lines Flag Sussex 14 Aug 21 2.35pm Send a Private Message to Behind Enemy Lines Add Behind Enemy Lines as a friend

My question to those that are happy for unrestricted immigration into this country is, what is the maximum number of refugees/asylum seekers/economic migrants would you be willing to accept? Give me a numerical answer.

 


hats off to palace, they were always gonna be louder, and hate to say it but they were impressive ALL bouncing and singing.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View DanH's Profile DanH Flag SW2 14 Aug 21 2.38pm Send a Private Message to DanH Add DanH as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

If you are a genuine 'refugee' and fleeing for safety then it would be.

Choosing a location for preference is immigration.

Shows your 'genuine' for what it is.

You’ve literally created your own definition driven by your own agenda. I’m using the international definition.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View DanH's Profile DanH Flag SW2 14 Aug 21 2.38pm Send a Private Message to DanH Add DanH as a friend

Originally posted by Behind Enemy Lines

My question to those that are happy for unrestricted immigration into this country is, what is the maximum number of refugees/asylum seekers/economic migrants would you be willing to accept? Give me a numerical answer.

Very few people want unrestricted immigration.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 14 Aug 21 2.40pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by DanH

You’ve literally created your own definition driven by your own agenda. I’m using the international definition.

The 'internationalist' who moved to Essex.

I'm using the honest definition of a refugee that most people with common sense would understand.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 9 of 20 < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > What's coming into Western Europe ?.People or men?