Ukraine Situation - Should We Be Worried?
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Ouzo Dan 03 Mar 22 9.01pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
It's not my area and I haven't been following it, but last I knew Georgia was a Russian puppet state and Kazakhstan were in some deal with China. It would fit the usual norms (where Russia and China often fight each other), but currently sounds a bit strange. Presumably there's some disputed territory - I wouldn't know specifics. I could look it up but I trust myself more than most of the internet these days. Other way around they're trying to join the EU/NATO
Sex Panther 60% of the time it works every time |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
BlueJay  UK 03 Mar 22 9.19pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by YT
What was it previously then? Milton Keynes
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| cryrst The garden of England 03 Mar 22 11.15pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by BlueJay
This is far more likely to get Putin's attention than his own people, so is maybe a good sign that a solution other than violence can be reached. I expect Putin hopes for a good compromise, rather than an endless war. Or the company will be having a recruitment drive very soon.!
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| BlueJay UK 03 Mar 22 11.41pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Russian troops heading towards Europe's largest nuclear power plant, says mayor Russian troops have been seen heading towards Europe's largest nuclear power plant, a Ukrainian official has said. According to the mayor of Energodar, a column of troops have been spotted moving closer to the Zaporizhzhia plant late this evening. Earlier, the Ukrainian authorities reported that the Russian military were stepping up efforts to seize the plant in southeast Ukraine and had entered Energodar with tanks. "Loud shots can be heard in the town," said Mayor Dmytro Orlov. Russia has already captured the defunct Chernobyl plant, some 100 km north of Ukraine's capital, Kyiv."
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| BlueJay UK 03 Mar 22 11.46pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Footage from near Zaporizhzhia power plant [Tweet Link]
If there's a leak I'm of the belief that the impact would be more within the vicinity. At minimum, not a smart area to be firing in though.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Stirlingsays  04 Mar 22 2.15am |
 |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
All I am doing is pointing out the truth. Which is if people have the right to behave as they choose, then others also have a right not to associate with them. If the latter outnumber the former then their will, will prevail. Whether via laws or commercial pressures. Having "power" is an irrelevance. It's only behaviour that is. Nor is "censorship" involved. It's merely the freedom to reject behaviour if you find it unacceptable. Smokers can no longer smoke in front of others and no-one thinks that odd any more. The west has decided Putin's behaviour means he can no longer be accepted as a partner, and they are removing access to the things they own, but were prepared to share. That's not censorship. It's ostracising a pariah. You do not have ownership of the truth. No one forces you to associate with anyone, that is not the issue. State and corporate power operating as one is the issue. Corporate power is effectively the state when all of it speaks with the same voice.....that's one of the tenets of fascism by the way. The corporations were not allowed to differ. It is then a monopoly on power. For example, I have no issue with a bakery refusing to bake the gay cake. However, when all bakeries refuse to bake the cake under activist and governmental pressure, then we have a real problem because that's anti competitive monopoly controlled by the back door....if you excuse the pun. You saying 'power' is irrelevant isn't borne out in reality. For example, the communists have been allowed to operate, publicise and associate in western societies since Marx settled here. Communism literally advocates for the violent overthrow of capitalism, the very beating heart of the west, yet it was started in the west written not by the poor but by educated men of means who weren't persecuted. That was in a socially conservative era....one that actually believed in more thought freedoms than your lip service pays pretence to....When you refer to freedom of speech and then write 'but' what comes next just reads like Orwell's double speak. If you are indeed 77 then I want to point out that by the time I was born you were already an adult of some years at the age of around 24. The society you would have existed and operated within was far more conservative, in some areas, than even I would agree with....Yet you were allowed to operate freely within it, protest was allowed, parties were allowed....polar opposite opinion were allowed and not considered 'hate speech' because, outside of physical threats that whole concept was rightly considered nonsense.....It was considered soviet in fact. I will also point out that you travelled to and lived in very socially conservative societies with attitudes that outstrip anything Nick Fuentes talks about. You were not forced to live there, yet there you went. Yet now western society has turned into what I consider a weird form of socially liberal authoritarianism you want to treat the social conservatives of today as 'pariahs'....not allow them to promote their ideas, associate or compete in the ideological marketplace. Do you not see the hypocrisy? That is pure authoritarianism and no different to Putin or China....They justify their approach precisely how you justify it by claiming to hold the truth and some morality that's not allowed to be questioned nor countered. Was that not the authoritarianism that our grandparents fought against? You WE are wearing the emperor's clothes. Like him, if we take you at your word, you can't see that you're naked but your wrinkly butt is obvious to anyone else honest enough to look. Edited by Stirlingsays (04 Mar 2022 2.19am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Ouzo Dan 04 Mar 22 3.03am |
|
|---|---|
|
What I've been watching tonight is unbelievable, we're fast approaching military intervention & everything that comes with it.
Sex Panther 60% of the time it works every time |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| W12 04 Mar 22 9.55am | |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
You do not have ownership of the truth. No one forces you to associate with anyone, that is not the issue. State and corporate power operating as one is the issue. Corporate power is effectively the state when all of it speaks with the same voice.....that's one of the tenets of fascism by the way. The corporations were not allowed to differ. It is then a monopoly on power. For example, I have no issue with a bakery refusing to bake the gay cake. However, when all bakeries refuse to bake the cake under activist and governmental pressure, then we have a real problem because that's anti competitive monopoly controlled by the back door....if you excuse the pun. You saying 'power' is irrelevant isn't borne out in reality. For example, the communists have been allowed to operate, publicise and associate in western societies since Marx settled here. Communism literally advocates for the violent overthrow of capitalism, the very beating heart of the west, yet it was started in the west written not by the poor but by educated men of means who weren't persecuted. That was in a socially conservative era....one that actually believed in more thought freedoms than your lip service pays pretence to....When you refer to freedom of speech and then write 'but' what comes next just reads like Orwell's double speak. If you are indeed 77 then I want to point out that by the time I was born you were already an adult of some years at the age of around 24. The society you would have existed and operated within was far more conservative, in some areas, than even I would agree with....Yet you were allowed to operate freely within it, protest was allowed, parties were allowed....polar opposite opinion were allowed and not considered 'hate speech' because, outside of physical threats that whole concept was rightly considered nonsense.....It was considered soviet in fact. I will also point out that you travelled to and lived in very socially conservative societies with attitudes that outstrip anything Nick Fuentes talks about. You were not forced to live there, yet there you went. Yet now western society has turned into what I consider a weird form of socially liberal authoritarianism you want to treat the social conservatives of today as 'pariahs'....not allow them to promote their ideas, associate or compete in the ideological marketplace. Do you not see the hypocrisy? That is pure authoritarianism and no different to Putin or China....They justify their approach precisely how you justify it by claiming to hold the truth and some morality that's not allowed to be questioned nor countered. Was that not the authoritarianism that our grandparents fought against? You WE are wearing the emperor's clothes. Like him, if we take you at your word, you can't see that you're naked but your wrinkly butt is obvious to anyone else honest enough to look. Edited by Stirlingsays (04 Mar 2022 2.19am) Great post
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| kevlee born Wandsworth emigrated to Lanc... 04 Mar 22 10.07am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Ouzo Dan
What I've been watching tonight is unbelievable, we're fast approaching military intervention & everything that comes with it. Bombing a nucluer power station... sounds very dangerous, but Ukraine and the western allies pushed Putin into doing it didnt they. Its all our faults really.. Ukraine has no one to blame but themselves. All this global outcry is just woke virtue signalling according to some on here. Edited by kevlee (04 Mar 2022 10.07am) Edited by kevlee (04 Mar 2022 10.08am)
Following Palace since 25 Feb 1978 |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| silvertop Portishead 04 Mar 22 10.22am |
|
|---|---|
|
Somebody has probably already posted this and I am not sure it is 100% correct. I suspect he also has re-establishing the empire for "legacy" reasons as a goal. BTW "bee production"!? THIS IS WHY PUTIN WANTS UKRAINE: Ukraine is an agricultural country: Ukraine can meet the food needs of 600 million people. Ukraine is an industrialized country:
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| silvertop Portishead 04 Mar 22 10.25am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by kevlee
Bombing a nucluer power station... sounds very dangerous, but Ukraine and the western allies pushed Putin into doing it didnt they. Its all our faults really.. Ukraine has no one to blame but themselves. All this global outcry is just woke virtue signalling according to some on here. Edited by kevlee (04 Mar 2022 10.07am) Edited by kevlee (04 Mar 2022 10.08am) I think they have gone a bit quiet. Bexiteers also keeping heads down. One of, if not the primary reason, I voted to remain was a concern about Russia and China and the need for strength in unity against their expansionism. perhaps we now see why he intervened in our referendum. Chickens home roost?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Nicholas91  The Democratic Republic of Kent 04 Mar 22 10.32am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by W12
Great post Seconded. Very impressed with that observation.
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.