Long-live the King
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Lombardinho  London 08 Mar 24 1.25pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
I have no issue with it. I was countering this 1603 and 1567 rubbish - I've heard it all before. I'm a Tudor historian. I always hear that crap and wanted to point out how meaningless it is. A Sheik sounds alright though - we can all be rich and drive around in luxury cars. Not drinking though - won't work for me. Presumably there was an infiltration at some point.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Hrolf The Ganger 08 Mar 24 1.37pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Lombardinho
Kiwi actually. Of the fruit or bird variety? He lives upside down and is just another whinging republican.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
ASCPFC  Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 08 Mar 24 1.57pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Lombardinho
Presumably there was an infiltration at some point. True - there was a name change, as German was going to be seen as unpalatable in the war with the Germans. As for infiltration, not really - more power grab. Kings have been killing and been getting killed for all of history. Largely, whoever had the most power and killed the other contenders was king. One of our most famous kings is Harold. Interesting as that goes right back. He had no claim to the throne other than being rich, powerful and (unusually) popular. Being popular was probably a sure sign he wouldn't last to be fair to him.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Teddy Eagle  08 Mar 24 2.05pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
True - there was a name change, as German was going to be seen as unpalatable in the war with the Germans. As for infiltration, not really - more power grab. Kings have been killing and been getting killed for all of history. Largely, whoever had the most power and killed the other contenders was king. One of our most famous kings is Harold. Interesting as that goes right back. He had no claim to the throne other than being rich, powerful and (unusually) popular. Being popular was probably a sure sign he wouldn't last to be fair to him. Sounds like the early days of the mafia; popularity wasn't such an issue there though.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Lombardinho London 08 Mar 24 6.14pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Of the fruit or bird variety? He lives upside down and is just another whinging republican. I'm pleased you're open to information away from the official, government-approved narratives, Hrolf.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Lombardinho London 08 Mar 24 6.18pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
True - there was a name change, as German was going to be seen as unpalatable in the war with the Germans. As for infiltration, not really - more power grab. Kings have been killing and been getting killed for all of history. Largely, whoever had the most power and killed the other contenders was king. One of our most famous kings is Harold. Interesting as that goes right back. He had no claim to the throne other than being rich, powerful and (unusually) popular. Being popular was probably a sure sign he wouldn't last to be fair to him. Once the power-grab has been achieved, AS, it'll take something special to win that power back, I agree.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 08 Mar 24 7.22pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Lombardinho
I'm pleased you're open to information away from the official, government-approved narratives, Hrolf. I am far from a royalist. I dislike the whole idea of hereditary titles, and I'm not keen on Charles or Camilla. This guy is obviously a nut.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
PalazioVecchio  south pole 08 Mar 24 7.41pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I am far from a royalist. I dislike the whole idea of hereditary titles, and I'm not keen on Charles or Camilla. . you want a President instead ? we got a Leprechaun here in Ireland. And he is a mad Lefty too. Not averse to the odd gaff or sticking his Oar in and upsetting everybody. Lovely.
Eze Peasy at Anfield.... |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Lombardinho London 08 Mar 24 7.52pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I am far from a royalist. I dislike the whole idea of hereditary titles, and I'm not keen on Charles or Camilla. This guy is obviously a nut. That's just it. All the signs are there that they're in the process of being replaced. The press are trying to cover it up as best they can but it's obvious something larger is afoot. This nut, as you call him, seems to have a role to play in the outcome.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 08 Mar 24 8.31pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by PalazioVecchio
you want a President instead ? we got a Leprechaun here in Ireland. And he is a mad Lefty too. Not averse to the odd gaff or sticking his Oar in and upsetting everybody. Lovely. Indeed. Better the devil you know.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 08 Mar 24 8.34pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Lombardinho
That's just it. All the signs are there that they're in the process of being replaced. The press are trying to cover it up as best they can but it's obvious something larger is afoot. This nut, as you call him, seems to have a role to play in the outcome. Let's just say that I'll need a lot more convincing.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Lombardinho London 08 Mar 24 9.33pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Let's just say that I'll need a lot more convincing. Ultimately, in the long run, I don't think I trust this guy either. I think he's some kind of well-trained stooge to keep the wealth and control of the Crown with the elites, the 1%, the black nobility, whatever you want to call them.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.