Lee Anderson
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Hrolf The Ganger  06 Mar 24 1.07pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
As above, feel free to not comment in that case. Given I've never expressed anything close to that view, it doesn't say anything about me. You didn't need to. We all know it.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| EverybodyDannsNow SE19 06 Mar 24 1.12pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
You didn't need to. We all know it. Thanks for another great contribution to a thread. Maybe one day you'll actually engage on a topic without getting your arse handed to you. We live in hope.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 06 Mar 24 2.38pm |
 |
|---|---|
|
Anyone who supports the demise of GB News is against freedom of expression for politics they oppose. I suspect the problems GB News have aren't a product of viewing figures but of the same attacks networks like Fox or X suffer. We aren't living in a free society...the west's founding liberties have been subverted by the social liberals....the new puritans who quite frankly are a corruption of their founding ideals. ESG scores and the sheer fact that advertising departments of companies are full of left wingers mean that companies like GB News get boycotted. There is a call for a media outlet like GB News and if it falls I think the left are going to find out that it isn't the victory they think it is. They are the authoritarians.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 06 Mar 24 2.54pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
Thanks for another great contribution to a thread. Maybe one day you'll actually engage on a topic without getting your arse handed to you. We live in hope. You must be confusing me with someone else. I'm not sure if you could find your own arse with both hands, let alone hand me mine.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| EverybodyDannsNow SE19 06 Mar 24 3.06pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Anyone who supports the demise of GB News is against freedom of expression for politics they oppose. I suspect the problems GB News have aren't a product of viewing figures but of the same attacks networks like Fox or X suffer. We aren't living in a free society...the west's founding liberties have been subverted by the social liberals....the new puritans who quite frankly are a corruption of their founding ideals. ESG scores and the sheer fact that advertising departments of companies are full of left wingers mean that companies like GB News get boycotted. There is a call for a media outlet like GB News and if it falls I think the left are going to find out that it isn't the victory they think it is. They are the authoritarians. God, so dramatic. Companies like GB News get boycotted by advertisers because they’re unprofessional and people don’t want to affiliate themselves with that (see Andrew Neil). I’m constantly hearing that they’re simply putting out content that ‘the majority’ support - if that were the case, advertisers would be breaking their necks to get involved and advertise to their massive audience. The reality is, the audience for the stuff they put out isn’t half as large as people want to believe, and clearly companies advertising departments decide it’s not worth getting involved. They’ve fallen foul of regulators, audiences, presenters and are running at a massive loss - they’ve only made it this far due to hedge fund backers - why do they have a divine right to succeed as a business? Because you like their message? What’s the alternative here? They get guaranteed money for existing? Advertisers are mandated to advertise with certain companies? I don’t get what you’re asking for. Private corporations can advertise where and however they see fit. If that isn’t GB News, that’s a problem for GB News to solve, not anyone else.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 06 Mar 24 3.10pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
God, so dramatic. Companies like GB News get boycotted by advertisers because they’re unprofessional and people don’t want to affiliate themselves with that (see Andrew Neil). I’m constantly hearing that they’re simply putting out content that ‘the majority’ support - if that were the case, advertisers would be breaking their necks to get involved and advertise to their massive audience. The reality is, the audience for the stuff they put out isn’t half as large as people want to believe, and clearly companies advertising departments decide it’s not worth getting involved. They’ve fallen foul of regulators, audiences, presenters and are running at a massive loss - they’ve only made it this far due to hedge fund backers - why do they have a divine right to succeed as a business? Because you like their message? What’s the alternative here? They get guaranteed money for existing? Advertisers are mandated to advertise with certain companies? I don’t get what you’re asking for. Private corporations can advertise where and however they see fit. If that isn’t GB News, that’s a problem for GB News to solve, not anyone else. Your new obsession. Bless.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| EverybodyDannsNow SE19 06 Mar 24 3.16pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Your new obsession. Bless. Just let the grown-ups talk. Yet another example that you lack the capacity to engage in more than one-liners. I pointed this out to you about a month ago now. Really weak.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 06 Mar 24 3.20pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
Just let the grown-ups talk. Yet another example that you lack the capacity to engage in more than one-liners. I pointed this out to you about a month ago now. Really weak. I don't need more than one line for you. I don't really need more than one word. Can you guess which one it might be?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
ASCPFC  Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 06 Mar 24 3.34pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I'd say most people preferred Thunderbirds to Joe 90. I liked Captain Scarlet.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 06 Mar 24 3.51pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
God, so dramatic. Companies like GB News get boycotted by advertisers because they’re unprofessional and people don’t want to affiliate themselves with that (see Andrew Neil). I’m constantly hearing that they’re simply putting out content that ‘the majority’ support - if that were the case, advertisers would be breaking their necks to get involved and advertise to their massive audience. The reality is, the audience for the stuff they put out isn’t half as large as people want to believe, and clearly companies advertising departments decide it’s not worth getting involved. They’ve fallen foul of regulators, audiences, presenters and are running at a massive loss - they’ve only made it this far due to hedge fund backers - why do they have a divine right to succeed as a business? Because you like their message? What’s the alternative here? They get guaranteed money for existing? Advertisers are mandated to advertise with certain companies? I don’t get what you’re asking for. Private corporations can advertise where and however they see fit. If that isn’t GB News, that’s a problem for GB News to solve, not anyone else. The answers to most of what you wrote here were contained within the post you replied to. Edited by Stirlingsays (06 Mar 2024 3.52pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
cryrst  The garden of England 06 Mar 24 8.08pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Basically the common link to certain posters not wanting a debate is that it is 3 right wing posters. An obvious left wing trope. If you can’t debate then shut it down. GB news the obvious example with the joy the young poster is getting from its potential demise. The poster will get theirs when the left empty their bank account to help others. Then the penny will drop!
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| georgenorman 06 Mar 24 8.37pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
God, so dramatic. Companies like GB News get boycotted by advertisers because they’re unprofessional and people don’t want to affiliate themselves with that (see Andrew Neil). I’m constantly hearing that they’re simply putting out content that ‘the majority’ support - if that were the case, advertisers would be breaking their necks to get involved and advertise to their massive audience. The reality is, the audience for the stuff they put out isn’t half as large as people want to believe, and clearly companies advertising departments decide it’s not worth getting involved. They’ve fallen foul of regulators, audiences, presenters and are running at a massive loss - they’ve only made it this far due to hedge fund backers - why do they have a divine right to succeed as a business? Because you like their message? What’s the alternative here? They get guaranteed money for existing? Advertisers are mandated to advertise with certain companies? I don’t get what you’re asking for. Private corporations can advertise where and however they see fit. If that isn’t GB News, that’s a problem for GB News to solve, not anyone else. How's the Morning Star doing?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.