You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic
June 1 2024 11.36am

Tommy Robinson (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 16 of 236 < 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 >

Topic Locked

View DanH's Profile DanH Online Flag SW2 30 May 18 12.50pm Send a Private Message to DanH Add DanH as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

He was outside the court and had permission from the Police to be there (that's what I've heard).

He's been caught on a technicality by a judge.....as Robinson had not reported anything that other media outlets hadn't reported.....and as I've said, being outside the court....well that's taking the piss for what he's been taken for.

Though I'm hearing that he might also be getting off on a technicality.

Edited by Stirlingsays (30 May 2018 12.03pm)


I see you have as little grasp of the law and the reason why it is in place as he did.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Y Ddraig Goch's Profile Y Ddraig Goch Flag In The Crowd 30 May 18 1.28pm Send a Private Message to Y Ddraig Goch Add Y Ddraig Goch as a friend

A breakdown of the Stephen Christopher Yaxley case

[Link]

 


the dignified don't even enter in the game

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Badger11's Profile Badger11 Flag Beckenham 30 May 18 1.58pm Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Originally posted by derby eagle

I thought this fine upstanding fellow hadn't got a mention for a while.

Whilst we all probably know his intentions, the brazen stupidity of committing the same offence for which he had an active suspended sentence baffles me!

I am currently having this argument with a friend, Robinson is an idiot. This is not some great miscarriage of justice. He had already been warned by the judge and ignored it. If he is the victim why did he plead guilty to the charge?

For a man who presumably thinks the defendants are guilty he is doing a good job of getting them off by giving their lawyers grounds for appeal.

As to the case why not wait until it is over then report on it. I heard Nick Ferrari on LBC say the media is desperate to talk about this so it will get covered. I don't know why there are reporting restrictions but often it is because defendants face multiple trials. Whatever the reason the courts cannot be blatantly defied and the defendants are entitled to a fair trial.

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Online Flag 30 May 18 1.59pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by DanH


I see you have as little grasp of the law and the reason why it is in place as he did.

The blind can't see.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Park Road Flag 30 May 18 2.58pm

[Link]

Defend freedom of speech.
Defend our right to hate and offend.
Defend our right to be free

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
View ddjdd's Profile ddjdd Flag Chichester 30 May 18 3.15pm Send a Private Message to ddjdd Add ddjdd as a friend

Having been previously warned by a judge, this idiot made an hour long video outside the court which may cause a trial to collapse.

Furthermore, he tried to video defendants and also commented on the trial, in a facebook live video which was watched by hundreds of thousands of people.

This is pretty much a textbook, prime example of contempt of court, and if you don't understand why such laws exist, please do some research before claiming 'freedom of speech'.

Prejudicing a court case is not a free speech issue.

While i'm all for allowing morons like tommy robinson (or stephen yaxley-whatever) freedom of speech to preach their nonsense about islam, so people who have one iota of understanding of issues of multiculturalism issues can refute his nonsense, I find it unbelievable that anyone who truly understands freedom of speech would consider this an attack on it.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View topcat's Profile topcat Flag Holmesdale / Surbiton 30 May 18 3.24pm Send a Private Message to topcat Add topcat as a friend

Originally posted by ddjdd

I find it unbelievable that anyone who truly understands freedom of speech would consider this an attack on it.

Well said.

 


It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Park Road Flag 30 May 18 3.39pm

Originally posted by ddjdd

Having been previously warned by a judge, this idiot made an hour long video outside the court which may cause a trial to collapse.

Furthermore, he tried to video defendants and also commented on the trial, in a facebook live video which was watched by hundreds of thousands of people.

This is pretty much a textbook, prime example of contempt of court, and if you don't understand why such laws exist, please do some research before claiming 'freedom of speech'.

Prejudicing a court case is not a free speech issue.

While i'm all for allowing morons like tommy robinson (or stephen yaxley-whatever) freedom of speech to preach their nonsense about islam, so people who have one iota of understanding of issues of multiculturalism issues can refute his nonsense, I find it unbelievable that anyone who truly understands freedom of speech would consider this an attack on it.



Let's hope your understanding of morons includes the hatred and nonsense preached by Islam and refute that nonsense, and how multiculturalism has affected not only us but our peaceful living scandanvians, and other non Islamic European countries.

Yet you probably find that unbelievable, and so do not understand the concept of free speech, but instead dwindle on legalities of filming outside a court.

I allowed myself to reply to your moronic dribble, but will leave it at that as there is sangria to be had

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
Park Road Flag 30 May 18 3.58pm

Originally posted by topcat

Well said.

Yeah right! Lol

4527794924_3631bacdb5-1-.jpg Attachment: 4527794924_3631bacdb5-1-.jpg (88.30Kb)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
pefwin Flag Where you have to have an English ... 30 May 18 3.58pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

The blind can't see.

My dog has no nose.

 


"Everything is air-droppable at least once."

"When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
Park Road Flag 30 May 18 4.01pm

Originally posted by pefwin

My dog has no nose.

How does he smell?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
pefwin Flag Where you have to have an English ... 30 May 18 4.12pm

Originally posted by Park Road



Let's hope your understanding of morons includes the hatred and nonsense preached by Islam and refute that nonsense, and how multiculturalism has affected not only us but our peaceful living scandanvians, and other non Islamic European countries.

Yet you probably find that unbelievable, and so do not understand the concept of free speech, but instead dwindle on legalities of filming outside a court.

I allowed myself to reply to your moronic dribble, but will leave it at that as there is sangria to be had

Freedom of speech is a two edged sword that many morons do not understand.

I prefer the idiots to spout what they wish and be seen for what they are; even if some now feel they have not the cojones to speak out and be proud of their ideology and prejudice rather than in euphemisms and passive aggressive prejudice.

These pussies are passive cunds hiding behind others be it religious or mummy's skirts.

After all isn't English to stand against oppression?

 


"Everything is air-droppable at least once."

"When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."

Alert Alert a moderator to this post

Topic Locked

Page 16 of 236 < 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic