This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by cpfc_chap
Looks like wisbech could be the hols Naz Shah!
does Wisbech have a poster of her on his wall ?
Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
No-one knows. You only think you know. I have already suggested several possibilities but I have no idea if they will prove to be correct. Unless and until you have heard the reasoning none of us will know. You take mealy mouthing to a new level. How many reasons could there be?
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by PalazioVecchio
does Wisbech have a poster of her on his wall ? I expect he has a picture of himself looking learned and always right.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I am NOT talking about the alleged "wholesale rape of thousands of girls by hundreds of pakistani men in an organised and systematic fashion.. and its associated cover-up". I am talking about the report into that allegation and why it has been decided not to make it available, yet, to the public. Nothing else. I am not offering any opinion on the allegation because I don't have the report either. I just want to ensure that any criminal involved in such terrible crimes as are alleged, faces justice without any unnecessary interferences. Including trial by tabloid media resulting in actual cases in court being thrown out. Alleged!! You should be ashamed using that word.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
You take mealy mouthing to a new level. How many reasons could there be? There is nothing at all "mealy mouthed" about not jumping to conclusions. I have already speculated on what the possible reasons might be, so if you missed them just read my earlier comments. It seems to me that some people always want to think the worst of others. I tend to give people who have to make difficult and controversial decisions the benefit of the doubt. I am just not that cynical about those we elect to make decisions on our behalf.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Tom-the-eagle ![]() |
|
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
There is nothing at all "mealy mouthed" about not jumping to conclusions. I have already speculated on what the possible reasons might be, so if you missed them just read my earlier comments. It seems to me that some people always want to think the worst of others. I tend to give people who have to make difficult and controversial decisions the benefit of the doubt. I am just not that cynical about those we elect to make decisions on our behalf.
"It feels much better than it ever did, much more sensitive." John Wayne Bobbit |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Alleged!! You should be ashamed using that word. They are always alleged until proved in a Court of law. The statement made was a sweeping generalisation that was no better than a headline from the Daily Mail. Once again people are confusing the very valid concerns that most people, including me, have about what seems to have been at best a sequence of unfortunate responses to a pattern of despicable criminal activity, with why the report is being handled internally. What lies behind those responses is what this report covers and is likely to be a whole lot more complicated and nuanced than many think. Why it deemed necessary to handle it this way is not known to me, any more than it is to anyone else. I anticipate though that the reason is to try to assist and hasten the action that everyone wants and not to delay it in any way. How long does it take? I cannot answer that but if publishing the report meant it took longer would that be a good idea?
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Tom-the-eagle
Frequently in the early days. He has though rarely deserved it and as time passes experience dictates it is not so willingly offered.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
They are always alleged until proved in a Court of law. The statement made was a sweeping generalisation that was no better than a headline from the Daily Mail. Once again people are confusing the very valid concerns that most people, including me, have about what seems to have been at best a sequence of unfortunate responses to a pattern of despicable criminal activity, with why the report is being handled internally. What lies behind those responses is what this report covers and is likely to be a whole lot more complicated and nuanced than many think. Why it deemed necessary to handle it this way is not known to me, any more than it is to anyone else. I anticipate though that the reason is to try to assist and hasten the action that everyone wants and not to delay it in any way. How long does it take? I cannot answer that but if publishing the report meant it took longer would that be a good idea? Putting the report aside. You said alleged rape. How many more convictions of Muslim gangs will it take before you admit there is a problem. How long have these crimes been going on? How many more MPs/ Police Officers statements will it take before you concede Muslim gangs systematically rape vulnerable white girls?
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Putting the report aside. You said alleged rape. How many more convictions of Muslim gangs will it take before you admit there is a problem. How long have these crimes been going on? How many more MPs/ Police Officers statements will it take before you concede Muslim gangs systematically rape vulnerable white girls? He wont admit it happened and still is happening for some reason. Maybe got a personal interest.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
There is nothing at all "mealy mouthed" about not jumping to conclusions. I have already speculated on what the possible reasons might be, so if you missed them just read my earlier comments. It seems to me that some people always want to think the worst of others. I tend to give people who have to make difficult and controversial decisions the benefit of the doubt. I am just not that cynical about those we elect to make decisions on our behalf. Who are these titanic parliamentarians in whom we’re expected to have so much faith? Just doing the job isn’t enough to imbue these people with any particular wisdom or even aptitude judging from past experience.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
But those legal issues would have been there regardless of the content so publication should never have been in question. So do you know why it has been kept internal? Or do you, like everyone else it seems, just think you know?
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.