Why is this assertion beyond doubt?

You are nieve.
1 you won't accept gang rape is disportionaly from Asian men.

2 you agree the report should remain secret even though it was under gone for a "no stone un turned " huge problem that has been accepted by police and carers that they turned a blind eye.

I still think you sympathise with the Asian men from one community rather than the innocent girls. Until you recognise it's from one community I'll always think your an Asian peodo gang sympathiser.

You layed your bed now lay in it.

What is disgusting is the inability of a small group of regular posters to consider the actual subject of remarks.

My remarks have no connection at all with the grooming gangs or the alleged botched enquiries and alleged cover up.

They are ONLY to do with why the report into them is being kept for internal use.

It seems these people cannot separate issues and just want to lash out, whilst making totally incorrect and insulting assertions as they do.

Now that really disgusts me.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

I might be naive but you are demonstrably ignorant.

I have expressed no opinion on whether the "gang rape is disproportionaly from Asian men" in recent comments. In the past though I have said that this seems an established fact.

I have expressed no opinion on whether the report should, or should not, "remain secret" because I don't know the reasoning. All I have done is speculate on what the reasoning might be.

I cannot stop you thinking whatever you like but I know you are totally wrong. You are also a disgustingly rude and very ignorant man.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

I am struggling to understand your point.

We know an investigation has been made. That's what this mini thread is about. Or ought to be.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Oh no I think it is very much about the subject of said report, it is the title of this thread.

You therefore have to question the mentality of someone who enters the appropriately titled thread, on a very sensitive subject matter, to vehemently defend a petty matter of bureaucracy to such lengths.

Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!