You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic
April 27 2024 6.02am

Coronavirus (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 316 of 1255 < 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 >

Topic Locked

View blackheatheagle's Profile blackheatheagle Flag Beckenham 27 Apr 20 9.59am Send a Private Message to blackheatheagle Add blackheatheagle as a friend

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

Additionally as Spidey pointed out earlier how will passport control and baggage reclaim work if you have to keep 2 metres away from each other

I have a feeling that there will be couple of superstition remaining that in fact adds not so much value to avoid risk but impact our daily life..

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 27 Apr 20 10.17am Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by Matov

Because ultimately it makes very little difference. Look, I promise you I am not seeking to be contrarian for the sake of it but the reality is that you cannot close down a modern countrys airspace for a disease like Covid-19, at least for any preventative purpose.

There is a French Aircraft carrier where out of a crew of 1600, 1200 have tested positive for Covid19. With 50% of them asymptomatic.

It is impossible to prevent it spreading. And with the level of infection in the UK, it makes no difference. That ship sailed months ago.

Isolating is about slowing the spread, not preventing it. With the harsh truth being, and one that no politician could ever admit, you want more and more people to become infected now. We have the medical capacity to cope with the small % of people who require hospitalisation and you probably want to ramp up infection rates now, not decrease them.

Yes that moment is coming, but it isn’t supposed to be for a few weeks. With hundreds on a plane you’re risking a whole plane full of infected people landing in England. It’ll only take one on the plane to infect virtually everyone. They won’t all be wearing FFP1,2,3 masks keeping 95% of particles out. They’ll probably be wearing cloth masks keeping 10-20% out and there coughs almost in, or no masks.

There are a lot of mixed messages. 5th test to be confident there won’t be another spike. Well without a vaccine you can’t be confident but I get that it’s better said than not. Now there are flights happening when the numbers aren’t down to what they’re aiming for and with the repeated comments by Matt Hancock. The 7 day rolling average of new cases (in lockdown) has just started to fall. It hasn’t fallen at all. It’s just a few less per day than a week ago. In a few weeks it could be well below what it was. Chart here. [Link]

‘ From May 1, flights will resume from Luton to selected airports in Hungary, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Portugal, Spain and Israel.

Owain Jones, Wizz Air UK's managing director, said: "As we restart selected Luton flights to provide an essential service to passengers who need to travel, our primary concern is the health, safety and well-being of our customers and crew.’

I’m all for releasing the lockdown but not individuals or companies to make the decision and causing a free for all. And why are flights from Israel essential? Maybe there’s loads of nurses flying to and from Spain and Portugal. I don’t know, although I doubt it. But Israel? Seriously?

I’m getting rather frigged off with people deciding when it’s over. I’d rather it continued for just a bit longer so there’s less spread with everyone cooperating and then we repair our country and keep vulnerable people inside.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 27 Apr 20 10.19am Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by blackheatheagle

I have a feeling that there will be couple of superstition remaining that in fact adds not so much value to avoid risk but impact our daily life..

It’ll be like the veg or pasta aisle in the supermarket, checkout queue at best, and most there will be in low risk groups. If you’re vulnerable and flying around you’re taking your own risk. The trouble is if you’re the unlucky few that get it or get it bad and in which country or island not equipped for treatment.

Edited by Rudi Hedman (27 Apr 2020 10.23am)

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View blackheatheagle's Profile blackheatheagle Flag Beckenham 27 Apr 20 10.29am Send a Private Message to blackheatheagle Add blackheatheagle as a friend

These ongoing flights.

This is obivously missed task by government. There may be rounds of debates for failure of testing numbers & PPE but this one was no-brainer.

True that puppets in WHO officially said travel restriction is not helpful in early February, however at least no putting a ban from suffering countries was a failure. It is clear that milestone for virus spread was the flights.

However, now 2 months have been wasted already, not sure how it can help further. It is now only a conflicting case like Spiderman mentioned, you can not travel to see your daughter but someone else who does not have residency in UK can travel thousands of miles and hang around from airport to his hotel or home destination..

Singapore banned everyone who is not citizen / resident to enter the country. Fo eg my colleague who was temporarily in UK - who has work visa in Singapore- stuck here because he can not go back. That - to me- also is an excessive decision..

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
croydon proud Flag Any european country i fancy! 27 Apr 20 12.58pm

Originally posted by Mapletree

Nurses’s what? Are you thinking what I’m thinking?

[Link]

V nice Indeed, almost worth getting laid up for, almost!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
View DANGERCLOSE's Profile DANGERCLOSE Flag london 27 Apr 20 1.33pm Send a Private Message to DANGERCLOSE Add DANGERCLOSE as a friend

Interesting

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 27 Apr 20 2.23pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

[Link]

Just got round to listening to Stirling’s link. The first thing the guest falls down on is saying the lockdown was too early and we should have waited for confirmation the NHS was overrun. I’m afraid it’s too late by then. He also says the only thing used then was ‘’dubious computer modelling.’’

‘’We now know the nhs wasn’t overrun.’’ That’ll be because of the lockdown, nurses and doctors back from retirement, overtime and nearly every other appointment cancelled. Not because nothing in the NHS changed.

They then use nurses making Tik Tok videos as evidence they aren’t seriously stretched and everything is hunky dory.

The guest, Hector Drummond, his pen name, then gets more sensible talking about his experience in risk/benefit analysis and the trend of handing all say over to virologists and epidemiologists.

Valid point about the civil service doing what it likes.

The different scenarios may have a low probability on the high number of deaths, however, they drift away from the initial point they made that the lockdown was to stop the nhs from being overrun. This was on 12 April so their viewpoint is gaining more traction, but they cannot be sure it wouldn’t be overrun and at the beginning they suggested we should’ve waited to see if the NHS was overrun. Again, too late, and you’re postponing and cancelling other treatments.

Agree on the left wing herd points which I heard him and Lawrence Fox discuss. Funny hearing Delingpole refers to left wing think tank Grace Blakeley as ‘the fit bird on tv.’’ A bit unfair saying that’s the only reason she’s on tv. Add that reason to bring too right wing for why he isn’t on tv.

Agree on the point made questioning why should we drop everything for people who don’t have any responsibility for their own health, but not in the initial period they’re talking in.

He does return to the lockdown being to save the NHS on 44 mins and raises the question on whether saving a few lives is more important than saving civilisation. They don’t classify what they mean by civilisation but I see it as responsible to the many millions more people over the deaths that’ll come from an indefinite lockdown until what discovery.

Their point on why didn’t the government do lots to deal with this before if it was deemed to be this bad. They didn’t go any further on this. No talk of China hiding the problem, how South Korea and Japan dealt with it through experience that we don’t have. Nothing. If anything we didn’t do enough when Italy and Spain were weeks ahead of our experience.

Agree on the keeping airports and borders open and it suiting people close to the decision makers.

Good point on there always being Sh1t politicians, including just before we went to war with Germany and they were effectively declaring war or marching into and claiming ownership of neighbouring countries.

And then good point against a lockdown until a vaccine, which is very economically irresponsible and one I got really concerned about a week ago, but just turned out to be medical people or anyone on tv atm wanting to air an opinion.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 27 Apr 20 2.30pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by DANGERCLOSE

Interesting

Agree on a lot of this, apart from Covid being the same as the flu. The rate of spread of covid is the concern. Flu has a shorter serial interval (the time between successive cases) and therefore spreads more easily. COVID-19 has a higher reproductive number, meaning infected individuals pass the virus onto a higher number of people.

His point about testing and getting people back to work. That’s going to be a long process. Think how long it’ll take testing 100,000 a day here.

Edited by Rudi Hedman (27 Apr 2020 2.37pm)

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Cucking Funt's Profile Cucking Funt Flag Clapham on the Back 27 Apr 20 3.37pm Send a Private Message to Cucking Funt Add Cucking Funt as a friend

It's been said that Johnson is looking full of vim so it looks like he's been taking The Donald's advice.

 


Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 27 Apr 20 4.17pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by DANGERCLOSE

Interesting

It is worrying because these doctors are getting themselves involved in what are essentially political decisions. I am forced to wonder if they have a MAGA baseball cap in their lockers.

If, for the sake of argument, their statistics are accepted as fact then their conclusions aren't, in my opinion.

This virus is not like the flu. It is much more contagious but even more importantly we don't have a vaccine for it. Without taking the measures we have the health care facilities would have been overwhelmed and many more deaths resulted. It's only because those measures were put in place that the doctors can report their statistics. Without them things would have been very different.

Of course more people are dying who have pre-existing conditions that increase the risk. That's totally obvious and to be expected. C19 is what tips many over the edge but it is still the cause of death, whether or not these doctors want to regard it as so. Some of those people might not have lived much longer anyway, but the fact remains that C19 was the final straw.

They are quite right to be worried about other health issues being made worse by our response to C19 and this needs to be addressed. Not though simply by abandoning the good work that has been done so far.

The vulnerable will need to continue to be protected until they can be vaccinated. Everyone else will need to practice social distancing to keep the infection rate within manageable limits.

I think their presentation could easily spark a bad situation in the USA. I hope it doesn't here although I see no prospect of the government agreeing with their conclusions.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View ASCPFC's Profile ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 27 Apr 20 4.35pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11

Some of the airlines are suggesting they will leave the middle seat free when they re-start. However I thought if someone sneezed or coughed the moisture drops went many feet so if someone at the back of the plane sneezes people towards the middle and will get it. So not sure keeping the middle seat free will help in that case.

We all know that this is just a ruse to avoid refunds. If you don't fly they won't refund you - as it's your choice rather than flights being cancelled.
Yes, I didn't want to die because I flew on your sh1ttily ventilated plane with loads of infected people and I didn't want to turn up somewhere in the middle of a lockdown - will not be accepted as an excuse if the airlines start flying.
They may as well fly as all of their staff are not well paid and fuel is actually basically free at present. IT will cost them less than the refunds they are supposed to give - by law.
And, you can guarantee our politicians will know all about it.
I have two flights coming up with Ryanair - one to New York - no matter what, I won't be taking them, but Ryanair will find a way to fock me over with the backing of government cronies.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Spiderman's Profile Spiderman Flag Horsham 27 Apr 20 6.29pm Send a Private Message to Spiderman Add Spiderman as a friend

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

Yes that moment is coming, but it isn’t supposed to be for a few weeks. With hundreds on a plane you’re risking a whole plane full of infected people landing in England. It’ll only take one on the plane to infect virtually everyone. They won’t all be wearing FFP1,2,3 masks keeping 95% of particles out. They’ll probably be wearing cloth masks keeping 10-20% out and there coughs almost in, or no masks.

There are a lot of mixed messages. 5th test to be confident there won’t be another spike. Well without a vaccine you can’t be confident but I get that it’s better said than not. Now there are flights happening when the numbers aren’t down to what they’re aiming for and with the repeated comments by Matt Hancock. The 7 day rolling average of new cases (in lockdown) has just started to fall. It hasn’t fallen at all. It’s just a few less per day than a week ago. In a few weeks it could be well below what it was. Chart here. [Link]

‘ From May 1, flights will resume from Luton to selected airports in Hungary, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Portugal, Spain and Israel.

Owain Jones, Wizz Air UK's managing director, said: "As we restart selected Luton flights to provide an essential service to passengers who need to travel, our primary concern is the health, safety and well-being of our customers and crew.’

I’m all for releasing the lockdown but not individuals or companies to make the decision and causing a free for all. And why are flights from Israel essential? Maybe there’s loads of nurses flying to and from Spain and Portugal. I don’t know, although I doubt it. But Israel? Seriously?

I’m getting rather frigged off with people deciding when it’s over. I’d rather it continued for just a bit longer so there’s less spread with everyone cooperating and then we repair our country and keep vulnerable people inside.

Perhaps we are importing Kibbutz workers!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post

Topic Locked

Page 316 of 1255 < 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic