Someone has hacked your account and posted this

"By the way ethnicity has nothing to do with grooming scandals. It is prejudice at its rawest to suggest otherwise. "

You then go on to say "I have less problem with describing these criminals as being "men of pakistani origin"

So you really do not see the self contradiction, serious question. Or in your world is pakistani not an ethnicity?

I would imagine a brick wall would be a challenging discussion for you, your denial of your actions is remarkable.

Edited by HKOwen (14 Dec 2022 12.30am)

Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

You wrote that ethnicity was not a factor then you change your tune depending on the semantics of use.

You are solidly back into RDD mode.

More power to you and the world you live in

Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

"By the way ethnicity has nothing to do with grooming scandals. It is prejudice atits rawest to suggest otherwise. "

FFS, this is what you wrote.

It's a matter of fact.

End of.

Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

What is wrong with you? You frequently get so confused that you begin to see things that just aren't there.

I did write the quote above, and I stand by it. It's not the ethnicity of anyone that turns them into a groomer.

However, I also wrote this "I have less problem with describing these criminals as being "men of pakistani origin" than describing them as "pakistani grooming gangs"".

I stand by that too. The statements are not mutually exclusive.

All the second means is that I believe the first term causes less harm than the second. I would not use either, but if others are going to, I prefer to see the first to the second.

Two things can both be wrong, but one can do more harm than the other.

That's truly a matter of fact. I rather doubt that though will actually be the end of. In your fevered imagination.

You must have a very blue face.

Edited by Wisbech Eagle (14 Dec 2022 11.19pm)

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

I can assure you that the feeling is mutual.

I said some would regard the difference as semantics but you are not even prepared to accept that. You are completely unable to see past your prejudices and are constantly just aggressively rude, insisting that you’re right when the truth is that you hold another opinion.

When I see Mick Lynch on TV these days I think of you.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Really? Surely the grooming gangs are creating division more than the language used to describe them. Wanting the wholesale abuse of children to stop isn't expecting "better behaviour".