You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Ukraine Situation - Should We Be Worried?
April 29 2024 9.20am

Ukraine Situation - Should We Be Worried?

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 348 of 461 < 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 >

 

View silvertop's Profile silvertop Flag Portishead 18 Sep 22 10.50am Send a Private Message to silvertop Add silvertop as a friend

Originally posted by becky


But as a commentator said last night, most 'hastily buried' victims of war are usually just chucked into a mass grave - not laid out neatly in rows in individual plots with a numbered marker.....

Quite and as said above for the media to hype this up as a latter day Katyn is shameful.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 18 Sep 22 11.31am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by silvertop

That scenario is unlikely not probable. Pure pub chat.

Is an opinion worthy of a "pub chat". Sorry, but no time for one today.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View silvertop's Profile silvertop Flag Portishead 18 Sep 22 12.00pm Send a Private Message to silvertop Add silvertop as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Is an opinion worthy of a "pub chat". Sorry, but no time for one today.

Our politics are close and generally our views align more or less. But Putin will not release huge levels of radioactivity into a neighbouring nation with a prevailing westerly wind blowing it into his own peoples faces.

He will not break the last post war taboo. That will be his legacy. Even the Chinese wont stand with him if he did (the khazaks have already secured a treaty of support from China in the event putin turns his gaze south). I would also be surprised if the military let him although I accept I don't know if he can bypass them.

And there is no such thing as a "tactical" bomb. There is only the bomb.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View ASCPFC's Profile ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 18 Sep 22 2.29pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by silvertop

Our politics are close and generally our views align more or less. But Putin will not release huge levels of radioactivity into a neighbouring nation with a prevailing westerly wind blowing it into his own peoples faces.

He will not break the last post war taboo. That will be his legacy. Even the Chinese wont stand with him if he did (the khazaks have already secured a treaty of support from China in the event putin turns his gaze south). I would also be surprised if the military let him although I accept I don't know if he can bypass them.

And there is no such thing as a "tactical" bomb. There is only the bomb.

Tactical nukes are very much a thing. They would be anywhere from half a kiloton to maybe 50-100 kilotons. You'd be looking at a few hundred metres radius of damage in the short term for the smaller weapons. The US famously had a nuclear mortar. [Link]

Small tactical nukes are the UK'S current thinking on nukes.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Badger11's Profile Badger11 Flag Beckenham 18 Sep 22 2.34pm Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Originally posted by ASCPFC

Tactical nukes are very much a thing. They would be anywhere from half a kiloton to maybe 50-100 kilotons. You'd be looking at a few hundred metres radius of damage in the short term for the smaller weapons. The US famously had a nuclear mortar. [Link]

Small tactical nukes are the UK'S current thinking on nukes.

Isn't there a neutron bomb? It doesn't leave residual radiation?

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View ASCPFC's Profile ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 18 Sep 22 2.49pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11

Isn't there a neutron bomb? It doesn't leave residual radiation?

The neutron bomb is designed to kill people whilst leaving infrastructure. The basic principle is that on detonation, the bomb emits mainly neutrons at incredibly high speed, and gamma rays. Both will pass through most buildings and vehicles yet kill anything living within the area almost immediately. It sounds useful, but not sure how much the actual blast and radiation has been reduced. I don't think they're as refined as was theoretically intended.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag The garden of England 18 Sep 22 2.50pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11

Isn't there a neutron bomb? It doesn't leave residual radiation?

Poor lass died a few weeks ago, Olivia I believe

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Mapletree's Profile Mapletree Flag Croydon 18 Sep 22 4.10pm Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11

Isn't there a neutron bomb? It doesn't leave residual radiation?

The pulse of neutron radiation would cause immediate and permanent incapacitation to unprotected outdoor humans in the open out to 900 meters, with death occurring in one or two days. The median lethal dose (LD50) of 6 Gray would extend to between 1350 and 1400 meters for those unprotected and outdoors, where approximately half of those exposed would die of radiation sickness after several weeks.

So that’s all good then.

They don’t really work in the rain

Edited by Mapletree (18 Sep 2022 4.11pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View silvertop's Profile silvertop Flag Portishead 18 Sep 22 4.26pm Send a Private Message to silvertop Add silvertop as a friend

Originally posted by ASCPFC

Tactical nukes are very much a thing. They would be anywhere from half a kiloton to maybe 50-100 kilotons. You'd be looking at a few hundred metres radius of damage in the short term for the smaller weapons. The US famously had a nuclear mortar. [Link]

Small tactical nukes are the UK'S current thinking on nukes.

I was talking political implications of the use of nuclear weapons.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Badger11's Profile Badger11 Flag Beckenham 18 Sep 22 4.36pm Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Originally posted by Mapletree

The pulse of neutron radiation would cause immediate and permanent incapacitation to unprotected outdoor humans in the open out to 900 meters, with death occurring in one or two days. The median lethal dose (LD50) of 6 Gray would extend to between 1350 and 1400 meters for those unprotected and outdoors, where approximately half of those exposed would die of radiation sickness after several weeks.

So that’s all good then.

They don’t really work in the rain

Edited by Mapletree (18 Sep 2022 4.11pm)

Yup I dont think there is such a thing as a good nuke.

I just hope that if Putin ever does decide to start lobbing nukes at the west ground zero is my home. I don't fancy surviving only to watch my skin and bits slowly drop off.

Edited by Badger11 (18 Sep 2022 4.37pm)

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 18 Sep 22 5.12pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Goal Machine

Sterling…. I don’t post that regularly but follow this thread and it’s comments closely and daily. I’m interested in the topic because it’s a big deal and half my family (although I’m not close to them) live in Kiev.

Generally, I agree with your opinions on most things, and you’re clearly an intelligent bloke, but I’m afraid you’re so off the mark with this. The way you conduct yourself against Wisbech suggests you have no proper response and resort to low level digs. For what it’s worth, I disagree with Wisbech on most of his centre/left views. If you want respect from passive HOLer’s, you need to post with more respect and up your game.

This war is simply about a deranged bully (Putin) trying to forcefully take land from a democratic and peaceful country in Ukraine. Any sane leader would focus on trying to make their country and people prosperous and successful. NATO are standing up to a modern day Hitler and so we should.

No one wants this war. If Ukraine/NATO/Europe accept it, then what country does Russia invade next? God forbid this war ever reaches our shores, but if it does, this is the sort of thing you fight for.

The Russian army don’t know what they’re fighting for. The Ukrainians are fighting for their freedom and future. Good will win.


Edited by Goal Machine (18 Sep 2022 7.50am)


A part of me respects the sentiments but there are some reasons why my view isn't your view.

You present the war in goody v baddy terms, which is very much how our media have decided present it....it's no different to what the Russians are doing over there. I often find that while many people will freely admit that the media lie to them they will end up believing most of those lies and half truths.

If you had been reading this thread since it began you would know that firstly my opinion was very much a pro Ukrainian one at the start (which agreed with supplying weapons) to what it is now....which essentially is one where I consider this war a hot potato with no up side to winning even if that were possible.

The reason I aim barbs at WE is mostly because he continually wants to repeat arguments that we have already had earlier in the thread. I can't really be bothered to endlessly repeat myself to the same person only for the same points to be posted at me. Unlike him I don't see myself as on some kind of mission to convince people of a view, I have always come onto Hol to let off steam and just give an opinion. If I think someone is disingenuous then I'm not continually going to engage.

My view changed to basically Victor Orban's 'the war would have been local, but the West intervened and made it global.' As my commentary earlier in the thread shows my position altered once I looked into the causes of this war and just the sheer level of lying that has gone on.

As I said earlier in the thread the real victims of this war are the civilians killed and maimed for the hubris of politicians. I will respect any man who goes to war for their country while not always agreeing with the reasons why....some of those reasons have been lies fed to them....and in the Ukraine conscription has meant that many people have been forced to fight against their will.

You say the Ukraine is a democratic and peaceful country. However the coup in 2014, which forced out the pro Russian president wasn't democratic was it. That's what caused the war back then. Also the Minsk agreement which ended the fighting was broken by the Ukraine by shelling the pro Russian side. The UN recognised that...and that went on for years right up till the invasion....How much of that was you getting in our media?

Both Russia and the west have been meddling in the Ukraine for decades and all this goody/baddy stuff is a smoke screen. People like Biden's son have been working with their corrupt rich right up till a few years ago.....People have been sucking money out of the Ukraine for decades.

Russia is bad and so is Nato.....a plague on all their houses as far as I'm concerned. The sooner this pointless war ends the better.

Edited by Stirlingsays (18 Sep 2022 5.13pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Behind Enemy Lines's Profile Behind Enemy Lines Flag Sussex 18 Sep 22 5.51pm Send a Private Message to Behind Enemy Lines Add Behind Enemy Lines as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11

Yup I dont think there is such a thing as a good nuke.

I just hope that if Putin ever does decide to start lobbing nukes at the west ground zero is my home. I don't fancy surviving only to watch my skin and bits slowly drop off.

Edited by Badger11 (18 Sep 2022 4.37pm)

As Sting once sang: “I hope the Russians love their children too…”

 


hats off to palace, they were always gonna be louder, and hate to say it but they were impressive ALL bouncing and singing.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 348 of 461 < 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Ukraine Situation - Should We Be Worried?